Klunker (Staging)

Lack of clarity of technical standards (T 1888/12 – WABCO)

The European Patent Office examines claims not only for novelty and inventive step, but also for clarity. This requirement in particular has become increasingly important in recent years. Patents are being rejected more and more frequently due to a lack of clarity. It is not always clear what is “clear”. For example, is an ISO […]

Lack of clarity of technical standards (T 1888/12 – WABCO) Read More »

Scope of protection of means-plus-function claims (CAFC -Williamson v. Citrix)

The scope of protection of a Patents is determined by the claims and their interpretation based on the description. If the claim only defines a function without structure, the description is used to determine the scope of protection under US patent law in accordance with 35 USC 112 para. 6. In a new decision, the

Scope of protection of means-plus-function claims (CAFC -Williamson v. Citrix) Read More »

Scope of protection of a black/white Trademarks (BGH – “BMW emblem”)

Colored logos are not only very catchy to the eye, but also convey emotions through the chosen colors. Nevertheless, such logos are very often not registered as color trademarks, but only as black and white trademarks. Is the protection of such a registration sufficient to take action against the unlawful use of the actual color

Scope of protection of a black/white Trademarks (BGH – “BMW emblem”) Read More »

Patentability requirement for mathematical methods (BGH – “aircraft state”)

One of the basic requirements for patentability is the technicality of the invention. This is the case if the claimed teaching involves the use of technical devices. Mathematical methods and programs for data processing as such are excluded from protection. In its ruling “Aircraft State”, the Federal Court of Justice now had to assess whether

Patentability requirement for mathematical methods (BGH – “aircraft state”) Read More »

Injunctive relief requires irreparable harm (CAFC .- “Ferring v. Watson Laboratories”)

Under continental European law, a person whose rights have been infringed has the right to demand that the infringer cease the unlawful act. Only in very special and practically rare circumstances will the court not issue an injunction. The situation is different in the USA. There, the court must carry out an equity test before

Injunctive relief requires irreparable harm (CAFC .- “Ferring v. Watson Laboratories”) Read More »

Creating innovations and protecting them under patent law

Developing products that are patentable and therefore promise above-average returns is not a matter of luck. Rather, it is a matter of applying the right system to the development work. What is important here? How can an SME achieve success with its limited resources? With his book “Creating innovations and protecting them under patent law”,

Creating innovations and protecting them under patent law Read More »

Supreme Court denies good faith protection against indirect patent infringement in case of presumed patent invalidity (Commil v. Cisco)

Anyone who supplies a device that performs a patented process to a third party without the right to use it can be held liable for induced infringement. Liability depends on the supplier knowing about the patent and being aware that the use of the device leads to a patent infringement. Is it possible to defend

Supreme Court denies good faith protection against indirect patent infringement in case of presumed patent invalidity (Commil v. Cisco) Read More »

Scope of protection of an abstract color mark (BGH – “Langenscheidt”)

Abstract color marks are considered particularly desirable because the color itself is protected, so that the use of the mark does not depend on a specific graphic form. How broad is the protection actually in practice? In the dispute “Langenscheidt v. Rosetta/Stone”, the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) assessed the scope of protection of

Scope of protection of an abstract color mark (BGH – “Langenscheidt”) Read More »

Scroll to Top